アメリカ人から、911疑惑の最新総合リンク集到来。同好の諸氏の研究を望む。

現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > 戦争３５ > 808.html

アメリカ人から、911疑惑の最新総合リンク集到来。同好の諸氏の研究を望む。
http://www.asyura.com/0306/war35/msg/808.html
投稿者木村愛二日時 2003 年 6 月 17 日 17:25:05:

(The Web pages below have been backed up. If any links are dead, the
backed-up page can be mailed on request.)

THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11

Last updated June 14 2003

Section 1: Airforce stand-down

1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media that fighter jets
were scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. This is completely
untrue as the following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, by Illarion Bykov and Jared
Israel, 14 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm

1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov
2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm

1:3 9-11: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm

1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11, they just "arrived late "
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm

1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001
http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm

1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm

1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm

Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine
procedure.
Here's an example of how routine it is.

1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane. Netscape news. May 15 2003.
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_2-T&oldflok=FF-
APO-1110&idq=/ff/story/0001/20030515/001648315.htm&sc=1110&floc=NW_2-T

The procedures were already in place before Sept 11 2001.
It happened 67 times in the 10 months between September 2000 and June
2001.

1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13
2002.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events.
Fox news Aug 12 2002
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top

So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and why has
a cover-up story been concocted?

In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through incompetence,
(not once but 4 times!) where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behavior of G.W.Bush

It has become common mythology in the media that George W. Bush was
at Booker Elementary School when he learned of the first WTC crash.
This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he was, and what he knew?

2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and
Jared Israel.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm

This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements that
morning. See how many times he has changed his story.

2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")

2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1. A strange press conference.
By Jared israel and francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm

2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it Solves
by Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White [7 October 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm

2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV
Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC
Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002]

http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm

Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying about
where he was, what he was doing and what he knew, during the crucial
period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Why did the President - after being told "America is under attack" -
continue to listen to schoolchildren reading for another 25 minutes?
Why was he cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at
least one more hijacked plane was on the loose? View the TV footage
which proves treason at the top level.

2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Section 3: The Ficticious Hijackers

If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any
of the passenger lists? If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the
"innocents" on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?
3:1
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)

3:2
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
AA 77 (Pentagon crash)

3:3
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)

3:4
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
UAL 93 (Pensylvannia crash)

If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases (19
obviously Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic ID, with 100%
success rate?), why did the FBI claim that they were traced through
the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own names?

If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as
claimed in this article
3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html
why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they
(allegedly) get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance
systems, while being searched, but avoiding security cameras and not
being on the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were searched,
and if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger
lists?

What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still alive,
and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm
3:9http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/
STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/still_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html
3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm
3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html
3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml
3.15
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/
widen23.xml
3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html
3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm
3.18
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-
0109190363sep19.story?coll=chi-news-hed

According to this article
3:11
http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/
sharedcontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/
121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+U
sed+Gas&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the
passengers and crew. If they used gas they would have been affected
themselves - unless they had masks. The story gets better all the
time. They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns,knives and
electronic guidance systems, in spite of being searched, didn't show
up on the airport security cameras, and were not on the passenger
lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars outside the
airport (last-minute brushing up on the way there, about how to fly
the things!) and then crashed the planes in breath- taking displays
of skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who they were, their
passports were conveniently found in spite of fiery crashes which
incinerated the planes and occupants. So they got on board with false
IDs but used their real passports ?

If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and airport
security systems failed due to incompetence (not once but 19 times!),
where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into
racehorse doping scandals.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

Section 4: More oddities

Why the official story concerning the hijacking of AA11 (first WTC
crash) cannot possibly be true.

4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer1s Cut) American Airlines Flight 11,
Reexamined By David L. Graham
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html

Was an urban rescue team sent to New York the night before the
attacks?
4:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm
4:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm

4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects official story of 9-11
attacks.
Interview with Andreas von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html

National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse spokesman Fleischer
lied in saying that nobody had ever concieved of planes being used in
this manner, their statements in this article,

Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public
Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002
4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html

when the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in article 2:1
demonstrates that the potential problem had been recognized for
decades.
And there are other examples of this possibility having been widely
recognized prior to sept 11.
4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001
http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm

In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat had been
overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas. The statement she made is
in this press briefing.
4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice
The James S. Brady Briefing Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html

But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.

4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by Bob Woodward and
Dan Eggen. Washington Post staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-
dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A35744-2002May17¬Found=true

What did happen to Flight 93? by Richard Wallace. The Daily Mirror
sept 13, 2002

4:9 http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/mirror091302.html

4:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm

4.11
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/
page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&siteid=50143

Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type allegedly made by
passengers on Sept 11 possible ?

4:12
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/
project_achilles_report_1_030123.html

4.13
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/
project_achilles_report_2_030225.html

Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?

Why is it that the US government doesn't feel confident enough of its
case against Bin laden to lay any formal charges, but keeps "finding"
convenient video "confession" tapes? Probably because new video
technology makes it impossible to distinguish between a real video
confession and a fake.

When seeing and hearing isn't believing. by William M. Arkin.
Washington Post Feb 1 1999
5:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm

Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins Sydney Morning
Herald. may 16 2002
5:2 http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html

For more detailed evidence of a preplanned agenda to fabricate
evidence against Bin Laden,

Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
2:2
http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "Evidence please !")

It has become a common myth that Bin Laden has admitted to the
attacks. This simply isn't true.

Bin laden denies terror attacks and points finger at jews.
Annanova news.
5:3
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/
sm_410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines

Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks holy war. ABC news
online Sept 17 2001.
5:4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010917010639_1.htm

Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS ONline Milwaukee
Jornal Sentinal Sept 16 2001
5;5 http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/sep01/binladen-denial.asp

Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in USA were committed
by some American terrorist group. Pravda Sept 12 2001
5:6 http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/2001/09/12/14910.html

Bin laden Denies US attack says paper. Middle East News
5:7 http://www.metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-37/reg/bin_laden_denies.htm

Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN sept 17 2001
5:8 http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html

Bin Laden denies role in attacks. newsday.com Sept 17 2001
5:9 http://www.newsday.com/ny-wobin172369727sep17,0,7370581.story

Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in attacks. Yahoo news Sept 13
2001.
5:10 http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/denies-reuters-taliban.htm

Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge

In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported that
investigators were already looking into huge volumes of insider
trading on airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared? Do authorities
seriously expect us to believe that more than a year later, they
still do not know who was responsible? Should not alarm bells have
been ringing BEFORE the attacks with these record volumes of trading?
If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the firm
which handled much of the trade, are we seriously expected to believe
that he doesn't know who was responsible?

Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly Into The
CIA's Highest Ranks -- CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard
Managed Firm That Handled `Put' Options on UAL, by Michael C.
Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001
6:1 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html

Mystery of terror 'insider dealers', by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001
6:2 http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402

Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11, by Tom Flocco - Edited
by Michael C. Ruppert, 6 Dec 2001
6:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FLO112B.html

Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into local
government contract scandals.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
Section 7: The pentagon frame up and the WTC plane switch

It is alleged that that American Airlines 77 (a hijacked Boeing 757)
crashed into the Pentagon. A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with
a wingspan of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make an
initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a 35 ft depth of the
outer ring of the building - and not leave any wreckage outside ?
This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
7:1 http://66.129.143.7/june2aa.htm
proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon was NOT AA 77, which
demonstrates the Pentagon attack to have been a self-inflicted frame
up.

For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official story
7:2 http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

For a full physical analysis of the crash scene

Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard
Holmgren Oct 2002
7:3 http://alberta.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/4578.php

Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate eyewitness evidence for
the official story regarding AA 77?

Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. by Gerard
Holmgren June 2002

7:4
http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/
front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast

7:5 The Pentaogn crash hoax
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/WhatHitThePentagon/

What hit WTC towers? Were they the planes we've been told ? ( AA 11
and UAL 175)

http://whatzit.bravepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sectrion 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a retaliation for Sept
11, why had it already been planned months before ?

BBC News report by George Arney.
8:1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/
1550366.stm

U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house given strategy two
days before Sept 11.NBC news. May 16 2002
8:2
http://216.239.33.100/
search?q=cache:A5WwRGMKgTYC:www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/
msnbc051602.html+U.S.+Planned+for+attack+on+Al+-
Qaeda.+White+house+given+strategy+two+days+before+Sept+11.&hl=en&ie=UTF-
8

US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September 11 By David Rennie in
Washington

8:3
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/08/05/
walq05.xml

US Tells of covert Afghan plans before 9/11 By Bob Drogin LA Times
May 18 2002
8.5 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-051802strike.story

Why were we originally told that the attack on Afghanistan was not
planned prior to sept 11, and was purely a retaliation to a
"surprise" attack, and the story then changed after proof of the
preplanned attack came to light ?

Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind the scenes.

The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden so much that
they wanted to get him first. So why didn't they arrest him when they
had the chance in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American
Hospital last July in Dubai, by Alexandra Richard, Translated
courtesy of Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001
9:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html
9:2 http://guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html
9:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/lefigaro.htm

Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked away by Michael C. Ruppert
9:4 http://www.rense.com/general16/bin.htm
And why was the Bush family still in business with the Bin Laden
Family, even AFTER Sept 11?

Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business Connections, Alliance With
Pakistan Will Stimulate Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control
--Colombian Opium Production Will Soar; The Taliban's Biggest
Economic Attack on the U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of
Its Opium Crop by Michael C. Ruppert, 18 Sept 2001
9:5 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html
Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001
9:6 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAZ112A.html

Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm, by Leslie
Wayne, 5 Mar 2001
9:7 http://www.truthout.com/0662.Bush.Saudi.htm

The George W. Bush Money Tree
9:8 http://www.bushnews.com/bushmoney.htm

Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's oil companies funded
by Bin Laden family and wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden,
by Rick Wiles,Sep 2001
9:9 http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/bushsecrets.htm

Arms Buildup Enriches Carlyle Group, Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark
Fineman, 10 Jan 2002
9:10 http://www.truthout.com/01.11F.Arms.Carlyle.htm

Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel
9:11 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm

BushLaden by Jared Israel
9:12 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htm

Addition to the above article
9:13 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen2-i.htm

Judicial Watch:Bush/Bin Laden connection " has now turned into a
scandal " Statement from Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel
9:14 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/jw.htm

9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster:Take two ! by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/taketwo-a.htm
9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had business ties with Osama's
Brother in Law by Michel Chossudovsky 27 december 2002
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO212A.html

And why did the US turn down an offer to extradite Bin Laden in 1996,
AFTER naming him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Section 10: The suspicious collapse of the World trade centre Towers.

How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry? Why was the debris
rushed away for recycling before any examination could be held?

10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html
10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. part 2 by J.McMichael
http://serendipity.li/wot/mslp_ii.htm

"Burning Questions...Need Answers": Fire Engineering's Bill Manning
Calls for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse, 4 Jan 2002
10:3
http://zgrams.zundelsite.org/pipermail/zgrams/2002-January/000200.html
10:4 http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2002/markr19-12.htm
10:5
http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/PDF/FireEngineering-1-4-02-
BurningQuestionsNeedAnswers.pdf
10:6 A firefighter says "we think there were bombs set in the building"
http://people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-3,00.html

10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on Why the WTC collapsed by
John Flaherty and Jared Israel
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/albu.htm

10:8 Documentary footage from the scene of the WTC attacks,and
eyewitness accounts from firefighters at the scene reveal serious
flaws in the official accounts.
http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings/911-oddities-revealed.htm

For a series of engineering articles and informative videos on the
WTC collapse, see

10:9 http://home.attbi.com/~jmking/Collapse_update.htm

10:10 Evidence of explosives in South WTC Tower collapse
http://la.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/23816.php

10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/wtc-demolition.htm

10:12 Chapter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment)
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch1.htm

10:13 Chapter 2 (with comment)
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch2.htm

10.14 The jet fuel. How hot did it heat the World trade Center?
http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064

10.15 Proof of controlled demolition at the WTC by Jerry Russell, Ph.D.
http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm

10.16 Where's the inferno?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_fire.htm

Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene) burns at 800
degrees. Are we seriously expected to believe that burning kerosene
towards the top of the building ( heat travels upwards ) somehow
caused both towers to neatly implode in a manner identical to that of
a controlled demolition ?
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into suburban
housefires. Why is discussion of the possibility of a controlled
implosion completely taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing
ridiculous stories about burning jet fuel melting steel?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Section 11: Hands off Bin Laden !

Why were the FBI told to not investigate the Bin Laden family links in
the US?

Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript of a BBC Newsnight
Report on "the questionable links of the bin Laden Family," 6 Nov 2001
11:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BBC111A.html
11:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probetrans.htm (added comments
by Jared Israel)

Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001
11:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HIN111A.html

US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil', by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov
2001
11:4 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR111A.html
11:5 http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news369.htm
Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror Links Say They Were
Told, 'Let Sleeping Dogs Lie'
By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News Dec 19 2002
11:6
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/
FBI_whistleblowers021219.html
After capturing one of the six most wanted Taliban leaders, the US
then let him go. "By mistake " of course, because of "flawed
intelligence."
11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake' Sunday Times Dec 19 2002
http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/
0,7034,5704967%255E15574,00.html
11:8 US accidentally set wanted taliban Leader free. Clari news dec 18
2002.
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/bn/Qus-attacks-
taliban.RVGa_CDI.html
11:9 FBI agent Robert Wright says FBI assigned to intelligence
operations continue to protect terrorists from criminal
investigations and prosecutions. Judicial Watch Sept 11, 2002.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/2469.shtml

Section 12: Its really not so surprising.

In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA plan to commit
terrorist acts against the US and frame Cuba.

Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S.
Cities to Provoke War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001
12:1 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html

Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962, The National
Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001
12:2 http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/

Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war. Comments by Jared Israel.
12:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm

US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.
12:19 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/bamford.htm
If such tactics were considered normal and acceptable practice by the
Government in 1962, what evidence is there that things have changed?

Henry Kissinger advocated a similar strategy in 1992
12:20 http://www.spotlight.org/Newsbureau/Prisoner/Media/media.html

as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.
A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE
ARE? Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book -
It Is "A Blueprint for World Dictatorship," Says a Former German
Defense and NATO Official Who Warned of Global Domination in 1984, in
an Exclusive Interview With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert
12:21 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaeda Network?

A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror -- The United States
and Islam, by Carol Brouillet ・
13:1 http://www.communitycurrency.org/vital.html

Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream media articles.
Compiled by Jared Israel
13:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm

The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam
13:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/creat.htm

"Articles documenting US creation of taliban and Bin Laden's
terrorist network" Series of links to different articles
13:4 http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm

"Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel
13:5 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/madein.htm

"Bush and the media cover up the Jihad schoolbook scandal" by Jared
Israel
13:6 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm

U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo, by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov
2001
13:7 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html
Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda? Or the KLA? by Jared Israel
13:8 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm

Section14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?

Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National
Security Adviser [Posted 6 October 2001]
Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits: Afghan war and
Islamism were made in Washington
14:1 http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm

Section 15:Why have the President and Vice President resisted moves
for an inquiry into Sept 11?

Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes CNN Jan 29 2002.
15:1 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/
Bush,GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002
15:2 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators/
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry Reuters newswire UK
May 26 2002
15:3 http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1680
Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002,
2:22pm
15:4
http://www.mikehersh.com/Bush_and_Cheney_Block_911_Investigation_.shtml
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public
Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002
4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel. CBS News. May 23 2002.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
15:6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers told Bush. White House retreats on
independent probe.
Dana Priest and Dana Milbank. Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page
A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-
dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A46446-2002Sep20¬Found=true
15.7 White House refuses to release Sept 11 info. by Frank Davies
Miami Herald May 5 2003
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/
5792329.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

　次へ　前へ

戦争３５掲示板へ

フォローアップ:

投稿コメント全ログ　コメント即時配信　スレ建て依頼　削除コメント確認方法

★阿修羅♪　http://www.asyura2.com/ 　since 1995

　題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。