現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争３８ > 957.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争３８ > 957.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
米国の、インターナショナル求人活動。【Steve Bell の漫画です。】
多分、このよだれを口から流しているお方はラムズフェルドでしょうね。
http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoons
05.09.03: US calls for greater international involvement in Iraq
米国は、イラクへのさらなる国際的な関わり（主に国連）を求めている。
International suckers
世界中にいるお人好しさんへ。
I want you for U.S. army chores.
米軍の毎日のお仕事にあなたが必要です。
※直截的、そのものズバリの意味で言えば、choresは「雑役、雑用」です。(^^;
■sucker {名-2} → エサのように見えるものは何でも飲み込んでしまう
魚、よく考えずにエサに飛びつく人、だまされやすい人、お人好し、ばか、
カモ、吸う＾人［もの］、考えが甘い人、世間知らず、乳児
（英辞郎より）
米国の表題のような国際的呼びかけを考える時には、下記の漫画を見て米
国の真の意図を分析しましょう。
イラク現地本部爆弾テロ事件と猿ブッシュ。【久しぶりのSteve Bell の漫画です。】
http://www.asyura.com/0306/war38/msg/671.html
投稿者 クエスチョン 日時 2003 年 8 月 23 日 14:20:07:WmYnAkBebEg4M
「そうそう、国連の役目があったよね。（糞掃除・片づけが）」
http://www.asyura.com/0304/war31/msg/986.html
投稿者 クエスチョン 日時 2003 年 4 月 13 日 12:43:21:WmYnAkBebEg4M
Fresh row over UN role in Iraq
Jon Henley in Paris, Patrick Wintour and Michael White
Friday September 5, 2003
The Guardian
France and Germany yesterday warned Britain and the US that Washington's draft
United Nations resolution on Iraq does not yet give the UN enough of a role to
allow them to accept it.
As Whitehall confirmed a review of British troop levels in Iraq after recent
attacks, the caution shown by Paris and Berlin contrasted with the upbeat tone
expressed by Tony Blair. He predicted that critics and supporters of the war -
including France and Germany - would rally because they had a common interest in
seeing a stable and prosperous Iraq.
President Jacques Chirac gave no sign of hurrying to meet Mr Blair's
expectations. "We are ready to examine the proposals, but they seem quite far
from what appears to us the primary objective, namely the transfer of political
responsibility to an Iraqi government as soon as possible," he said after talks
in Dresden with the German chancellor, Gerhard Schroder.
Mr Schroder said the draft resolution showed "some movement" from the Bush
administration in calling on the international community for more help in Iraq
and offering the UN a larger role in the country's security, political
transition and reconstruction. But it did not go far enough.
"I agree with the president when he says 'not dynamic enough, not sufficient',"
he said, adding that both countries, while wanting to help restore peace and
stability to Iraq, were adamant that the UN must take control of the political
process.
In Washington's draft the US would not give up political or military control.
Although Paris is keen not to appear obstructive after last February's row at
the UN, that insistence is a major stumbling block.
"Now is the time to look forward, and that can only happen if the UN can take
responsibility for the political process," Mr Schroder said. Both leaders
predicted that an eventual UN security council vote on the resolution was still
some way off.
British diplomatic sources were not despondent at the initial Franco-German
rejection of the UN draft. France was bound to seek a high price for involvement,
Whitehall admitted. The French will be willing to contribute to a UN-mandated
force under US control if a clear route map exists to Iraqi control after
democratic elections.
But coming from two of the most ardent opponents of the war in Iraq - one of
them, France, a veto-holding permanent member of the council - yesterday's
opening skirmish is an early blow to the Bush administration's bid to get more
countries to contribute troops and money to its occupation.
Mr Chirac last week urged the US to move "without delay" to transfer full
political power to the Iraqi people under the mandate of the UN. And at his
monthly press conference yes terday Mr Blair seemed to echo that emphasis - as
he stressed the growing role of the Iraqi governing council.
He accused "a small number of Saddam's supporters and an increasing number of
outside terrorist groups" of acting to undermine the prospect of a "stable,
prosperous and democratic" Iraq.
"They know such a country reborn would spell an end to their hopes of persuading
the Arab world down the path of extremism," said Mr Blair.
Mr Blair's evident reluctance to commit more British troops to Iraq came as the
defence secretary, Geoff Hoon, announced a review of the British presence in
south-east Iraq, currently 11,000 troops. The foreign secretary, Jack Straw,
called for 5,000 more troops.
Mr Straw's plea for reinforcements came as the top US commander in Iraq, Lt Gen
Ricardo Sanchez, and the US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, called for
additional international forces of around 15,000 troops.
Mr Straw has warned in a leaked memo that security had to be improved in Iraq by
Ramadan or else the US-UK coalition risks "strategic failure" in Iraq.
Special report
Iraq
Guardian book
The War We Could Not Stop - the real story of the battle for Iraq, published by
Guardian Books and Faber. Buy it from Amazon.co.uk
Chronology
Iraq timeline
Interactive guides
Click-through graphics on Iraq
Key documents
Full text of speeches and documents
Comment and analysis
More comment and analysis on Iraq
Audio reports
Audio reports on Iraq
More special reports
Politics and the war
Aid for Iraq
Iraq - the media war
The anti-war movement
28.01.2003: Guide to anti-war websites
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。