|現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > Ψ空耳の丘Ψ３１ > 993.html ★阿修羅♪||
(回答先: ラルーシュのシナルキズムについての重要論文（「ＥＩＲ」二〇〇三年十月十七日）[週刊日本新聞] 投稿者 乃依 日時 2003 年 10 月 30 日 01:53:00)
The Synarchist Threat of the 'Beast-Man'
? by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
The following excerpt comes from LaRouche's speech to the business meeting of the International Caucus of Labor Committees, on Sept. 1, 2003.
Take the case of Synarchism.
Now, Synarchism can be traced, in its most essential roots, from sources such as the ancient cult, Phrygian cult, of Dionysus. Essentially what happened, is that some people in the 18th century, particularly those associated with the British East India Company, and Barings Bank, under Lord Shelburne, were out to defeat the American Revolution, even before it occurred. Because they knew what the American Revolution was. They dipped down into the cesspool of Geneva and Lyons, in Switzerland and France, to find some real filth, which leaned toward, axiomatically, something like the Phrygian cult of Dionysus.
And remember the characteristic of the Jacobins in the French Revolution, was the Phrygian cap. The most important fact about the French Revolution, is the role of the Phrygian cap. The Phrygian cult of Dionysus is the generic term, essentially, or the symbol, for what we call Satanism in civilization since.
So, the British reached down, and they found this cult, which they pulled together, through bankers, through family merchant banks, which are still in existence, in continuity, today. Which became the Martinists of that period, and the Synarchists of today. Every Synarchist is bad, every Synarchist is a fascist, right or left. Anybody who's attracted to Synarchism is a fascist, in the modern terms. I don't care whether it's in South or Central America, or wherever, he's a fascist. I don't care what else he says, he's a liar, he's a fascist, because he's a liar intrinsically, because he's Satanic. He believes in Synarchism.
Synarchism is the idea of the rogue, the anti-human rogue, who is considered the Superman, because he's capable of evil, which normal human beings are not capable of doing. Even very naughty ones.
And therefore, they said, what we have to do to stop the American Revolution, "We have to turn the rogues loose. We have to have an instrument, a cult," such as the Martinist cult?which was pulled together by these people, taking the worst features of 16th-century Spain under the Hapsburgs, like Philip II, which was a precedent for them. Remember that the Hapsburg accession in Spain was used to produce an instrument, to destroy civilization, and this continued through the Netherlands war, it continued through the Thirty Years' War. This was an instrument for destroying civilization. As Schiller describes it, men did not fight war as man against man, but as beast against beast. It was a cult of bestiality, and Spanish culture under Philip II and Philip III, was a culture of bestiality.
Europe under the Hapsburgs generally, was a culture of bestiality.
So, when it came to the time of the French Revolution, the British had already understood this, from an Anglo-Dutch liberal standpoint, which is another form of Satanism. And by their instinct for Satanism, as typified by Francis Bacon, or Hobbes, or Locke, or Mandeville, they applied that to the situation, and said, "How can we create a Phrygian cult of Dionysus, to destroy civilization? To prevent the American Revolution, which was then about overwhelming Europe with optimism, how do we defeat it? We turn men into beasts."
And the same thing happened recently. The Missile Crisis, for example. The Missile Crisis was modelled upon the dropping of bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And even without the nuclear bombs, it was already done in the firebombing of Tokyo, before the nuclear weapons were dropped. It was done in the bombing of civilian populations, under the direction of Lindemann and Bomber Harris, in the last phase of the war in Europe.