★阿修羅♪ 現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > 戦争47 > 823.html
 ★阿修羅♪
次へ 前へ
911ハンブルグ裁判崩壊 
http://www.asyura2.com/0401/war47/msg/823.html
投稿者 FakeTerrorWatcher 日時 2004 年 2 月 08 日 16:22:23:ctKRGOvG/DIEQ
 

ハンブルグでアルカイダ911容疑者無罪判決。証拠不十分。小泉は何をブッシュに見せられたのか。

『米同時多発テロ支援被告に無罪判決』
 ドイツのハンブルグ上級地方裁判は5日、米同多発テロの実行容疑者たちを支援した容疑者たちを支援した容疑などで起訴されたモロッコ人、アブデルガニ・ムズディ被告(31)に対して、無罪判決を言い渡した。
 同被告は昨年12月、テロ組織に属していたことを立証する証拠が不十分として拘留を解かれていた。(朝日新聞2月6日朝刊P.7)

 朝日はこの記事を国際面の隅に小さく報じた。『テロリストの軌跡 モハメド・アタを追う』で2002年に新聞協会賞を受賞した朝日にしては、ハンブルグをめぐるこの情報を報じただけでも良しとすべきなのだろうか。得てして、こうした小さなところに載せられている情報には大きな話が潜んでいる場合が少なくない。

 今回もそうだ。実はアフガニスタン戦争やテロとの戦いの大合唱のきっかけとなった911ハンブルグセル説がクラッシュしたのだ。小泉はブッシュからアフガニスタンの攻撃の前に911にアルカイダが関与した証拠を見せられたと国民に説明した。

 そのような911の重要なポイントであるハンブルグで容疑者無罪という判決があったのだ。


 この書籍は、アタがいかに冷酷なテロリストになったかということを大前提にして、アタのこれまで報じられた足跡をそれぞれの地域に派遣されている朝日の駐在員がそれぞれのスタイルで現地にわざわざ行ってレポートしているものだが、FBIによるアタのガールフレンドやアパートの住人に対する尋常ではない口封じ圧力も、フロリダの飛行学校の校長ルディ・デッカーのいかがわしさも、ハンブルグでアタが働いていた会社のことも掘り下げていない。

Even the Hamburg electronics company which employed three members of the core cadre - Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Ramzi Binalshibh - for more than two years while they were students is beginning to appear to be not quite what it seemed at first glance.

Hay Computing Service GmbH is suspected of being what is known in German as a "briefkastenfirma," literally a "mailbox firm," commonly referred to in the U.S. as a "dummy front company."
http://www.mafhoum.com/press3/88P51.htm

 朝日はインテリジェンスのセンスがない。私からしたらその本は観光ガイドと同じレベルのくだらないエッセイでしかない。(今は朝日はカラシニコフで同じ様なことをやっている。武器取り引きの暗部にはタッチしていない癒し系連載記事だ。)

 ハンブルグ裁判ではどこにいるのかわからないKSMやビナルシバの証言は拒絶され、出てきたのはイラン人(元)エージェント。しかしそれは報われなかったのである。

911、AA11スチュワーデス・テープとハンブルグ裁判
http://counternews.blogtribe.org/entry-944e74000f389f3ce962bd27e1ed47b4.html

 証拠不十分で公判が維持できなくなった原因はアメリカにある。

 このことは闇の核心に迫らないことには公判の維持が困難になったハンブルグセル説からアジアセル説にアメリカがシフトしたということを示唆すると考えられる。パキスタン、インドネシアなどの裁判はそれこそドイツに比べれば、カンガルーコートというものに等しいし、何せKSMにせよビナルシバにせよアメリカに引き渡されたもののどこにいるのかわからない。

 ブッシュに見せられた911情報について小泉首相は機密情報だから公開しないと国民に説明したわけだが、このハンブルグ裁判の一件はこうした「機密」という言葉の意味を疑わざるを得ない。

 繰り返すが、小泉首相は何を見て、あれほど簡単に911にアルカイダ、ビンラディンが関与していると確信したのだろう。政府がその時言った説得力のある説明とは何だったのだろう。

 以下にハンブルグ裁判崩壊を報じたIHT、NYT記事を転載する。911以降、アメリカのメディアの翼賛、腰抜けぶりは目に余るが、それでもまだ日本の大新聞よりはまともだ。



News Analysis: Germans blame U.S. for Qaeda acquittal
http://www.iht.com/articles/128573.html
Richard Bernstein/NYT NYT
Saturday, February 7, 2004

Americans refused to supply evidence

BERLIN From the point of view of many Americans - and certainly of many irritated officials in the Bush administration - the fight against international terrorism received a sharp setback when a German court acquitted a major Al Qaeda suspect, who was only the second man to come to trial in connection with the September 11 attacks in New York and Washington. But, from the German point of view, the acquittal Thursday of the defendant, Abdelghani Mzoudi, a 31-year-old Moroccan who was indisputably a member of the Al Qaeda cell in Hamburg that furnished several of the September 11 leaders, can be laid directly at the feet of the United States, which persistently refused to provide the cooperation needed for a conviction.

That hardly promises to improve the tenor of relations between Germany and the United States, just at a time when the two countries have been trying, with some success, to warm up ties virtually frozen in distrust and hostility because of disagreement over the Iraq war.

Beyond that, the Mzoudi acquittal signals the difficulties and ambiguities that are bound to surround efforts to get convictions of Al Qaeda members in democratic civilian courts. The Mzoudi trial was one in which, from the prosecution's standpoint, almost everything went wrong, and there is no assurance that there was any way, given German laws and trial procedure, for matters to have come out right from the point of view of the prosecution or the United States.

Indeed, as a consequence of the Mzoudi trial, there is now a strong possibility that the only man convicted for involvement in the September 11 plot, Mounir el-Motassadeq, another presumed member of the Hamburg Al Qaeda cell, will be released when he presents an appeal in a few weeks.

In Germany the morning after the Mzoudi acquittal, most commentators held the United States primarily responsible for the court's decision, which they saw as lamentable but unavoidable given the circumstances.

"A significant part of the blame for this lies with the U.S. authorities," the business newspaper Handelsblatt editorialized Friday. "They have dedicated themselves to a war against terrorism, but withheld an important witness in this and the Motassadeq trial. In the latter trial this could even lead to a successful appeal."

Certainly from the German point of view, there is something strangely, frustratingly counterproductive in the Americans' behavior, which has been to demand ever higher levels of cooperation from its allies in the antiterrorism fight even as the United States has rejected virtually all German requests for cooperation in the prosecution of Mzoudi.

"I find this conduct by the United States incomprehensible," Kay Nehm, the German chief federal prosecutor, was reported to have said Thursday following Mzoudi's acquittal.

The prosecution's case against Mzoudi disintegrated essentially over the refusal by the United States to find a way to satisfy the Hamburg court's request for access to information gathered during interrogations of captured Al Qaeda suspects. As the trial of Mzoudi unfolded late last year, the presiding judge, Klaus R?le warned that he might have to dismiss the case altogether if the requests for intelligence information were ignored.

This led Germany's Federal Criminal Office, a rough equivalent of the FBI, to what seems to have been a compromise formula, though it was a compromise that turned out to be a boon to Mzoudi's defense. The German police submitted a letter to the court that summarized intelligence information it had earlier received from the United States, specifically a statement by a leading Al Qaeda member made to American interrogators that neither Mzoudi nor Motassedeq was aware of the specifics of the September 11 plot.

The name of the Al Qaeda member was not released, but just about every observer of the trial assumed it was Ramzi bin al-Shibh, one of the top planners of the September 11 attacks. He is now in American custody.

Following the release of the police letter, R?le ordered that Mzoudi be released for the rest of his trial, an action whose portent was clear: Unless the court were given a chance to further examine Bin al-Shibh's testimony, Mzoudi would be acquitted. Responding to that pressure, according to the German magazine Der Spiegel, Interior Minister Otto Schily personally appealed to the American attorney general, John Ashcroft, for some way to satisfy the Hamburg court's demand, but he was rebuffed. The German Interior Ministry has not confirmed the Der Spiegel report.

Given the American refusal, prosecutors had to hope that other evidence against Mzoudi would convince the court of his guilt, and there was other evidence. For example, early in the trial, an Al Qaeda informant testified that both Mzoudi and Motassedeq attended an Al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan, and it could be assumed that any graduate of an Al Qaeda training camp was a willing and enthusiastic warrior in the cause of the Al Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden.

In addition, the prosecution showed that Mzoudi was once a roommate of Mohammed Atta, operational commander of the September 11 plot in the United States, and that he had helped with financial transactions that were part of the plot. Still, the problem for the prosecution was that there was no smoking gun refutation of Bin al-Shibh's exculpatory assertion regarding Mzoudi.

Would an opportunity to cross examine Bin al-Shibh or, at least, to examine the full transcript of his interrogation have led to a guilty verdict? Nobody will every know the answer to that question. It is possible that there would be enough contradictory material in the Bin al-Shibh interview to allow the court essentially to disregard his assertions regarding Mzoudi's innocence. There is, of course, no assurance that this would have happened, and then the Americans would have made an exception to their rule against making intelligence information public and still not have gotten a conviction of Mzoudi. Still, in refusing to find a way to grant the German court's request, the United States essentially stood by while an Al Qaeda suspect went free, even as it perplexed German officials doing their best to help in the antiterror battle.

The New York Times

関連
911、AA11スチュワーデス・テープとハンブルグ裁判
http://counternews.blogtribe.org/entry-944e74000f389f3ce962bd27e1ed47b4.html

Edger/Volz: The Oklahoma City-Hamburg connection
http://www.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/08/26/0648244&mode=thread

オクラホマ連邦ビル爆破事件、ユダヤ人権団体コネクション。灰色ドイツ人ネオナチおとがめなし、国外逃亡にFBI、米特殊軍協力。逃走資金には WACO遺族基金が当てられる。
http://counternews.blogtribe.org/entry-d0012c9c49cda2c197c9d7f3343e641e.html

Welcome to Terrorland! Start your tour here...
http://www.madcowprod.com/archive.html

*************
Counter News
by Fake Terror Watcher
http://counternews.blogtribe.org/

 次へ  前へ

戦争47掲示板へ



フォローアップ:


 

 

 

  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る


★登録無しでコメント可能。今すぐ反映 通常 |動画・ツイッター等 |htmltag可(熟練者向)
タグCheck |タグに'だけを使っている場合のcheck |checkしない)(各説明

←ペンネーム新規登録ならチェック)
↓ペンネーム(2023/11/26から必須)

↓パスワード(ペンネームに必須)

(ペンネームとパスワードは初回使用で記録、次回以降にチェック。パスワードはメモすべし。)
↓画像認証
( 上画像文字を入力)
ルール確認&失敗対策
画像の URL (任意):
投稿コメント全ログ  コメント即時配信  スレ建て依頼  削除コメント確認方法
★阿修羅♪ http://www.asyura2.com/  since 1995
 題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,MLを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。