★阿修羅♪ 現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > 戦争59 > 903.html
 ★阿修羅♪
次へ 前へ
チェチェンのアメリカの友人。【Guarian】ACPC のリストの中にはリチャード・パールやジェームズ・ウールジーの名も
http://www.asyura2.com/0406/war59/msg/903.html
投稿者 Sちゃん 日時 2004 年 9 月 09 日 23:06:31:4kC3WMVanvmFc
 

チェチェンのアメリカの友人

中段部分…
American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). のリストの中には
リチャード・パールやジェームズ・ウールジー他いろいろ。

Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1299318,00.html

The Chechens' American friends

The Washington neocons' commitment to the war on terror evaporates in Chechnya, whose cause they have made their own

John Laughland
Wednesday September 8, 2004
The Guardian

An enormous head of steam has built up behind the view that President Putin is somehow the main culprit in the grisly events in North Ossetia. Soundbites and headlines such as "Grief turns to anger", "Harsh words for government", and "Criticism mounting against Putin" have abounded, while TV and radio correspondents in Beslan have been pressed on air to say that the people there blame Moscow as much as the terrorists. There have been numerous editorials encouraging us to understand - to quote the Sunday Times - the "underlying causes" of Chechen terrorism (usually Russian authoritarianism), while the widespread use of the word "rebels" to describe people who shoot children shows a surprising indulgence in the face of extreme brutality.
On closer inspection, it turns out that this so-called "mounting criticism" is in fact being driven by a specific group in the Russian political spectrum - and by its American supporters. The leading Russian critics of Putin's handling of the Beslan crisis are the pro-US politicians Boris Nemtsov and Vladimir Ryzhkov - men associated with the extreme neoliberal market reforms which so devastated the Russian economy under the west's beloved Boris Yeltsin - and the Carnegie Endowment's Moscow Centre. Funded by its New York head office, this influential thinktank - which operates in tandem with the military-political Rand Corporation, for instance in producing policy papers on Russia's role in helping the US restructure the "Greater Middle East" - has been quoted repeatedly in recent days blaming Putin for the Chechen atrocities. The centre has also been assiduous over recent months in arguing against Moscow's claims that there is a link between the Chechens and al-Qaida.

These people peddle essentially the same line as that expressed by Chechen leaders themselves, such as Ahmed Zakaev, the London exile who wrote in these pages yesterday. Other prominent figures who use the Chechen rebellion as a stick with which to beat Putin include Boris Berezovsky, the Russian oligarch who, like Zakaev, was granted political asylum in this country, although the Russian authorities want him on numerous charges. Moscow has often accused Berezovsky of funding Chechen rebels in the past.

By the same token, the BBC and other media sources are putting it about that Russian TV played down the Beslan crisis, while only western channels reported live, the implication being that Putin's Russia remains a highly controlled police state. But this view of the Russian media is precisely the opposite of the impression I gained while watching both CNN and Russian TV over the past week: the Russian channels had far better information and images from Beslan than their western competitors. This harshness towards Putin is perhaps explained by the fact that, in the US, the leading group which pleads the Chechen cause is the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). The list of the self-styled "distinguished Americans" who are its members is a rollcall of the most prominent neoconservatives who so enthusastically support the "war on terror".

They include Richard Perle, the notorious Pentagon adviser; Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra fame; Kenneth Adelman, the former US ambassador to the UN who egged on the invasion of Iraq by predicting it would be "a cakewalk"; Midge Decter, biographer of Donald Rumsfeld and a director of the rightwing Heritage Foundation; Frank Gaffney of the militarist Centre for Security Policy; Bruce Jackson, former US military intelligence officer and one-time vice-president of Lockheed Martin, now president of the US Committee on Nato; Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute, a former admirer of Italian fascism and now a leading proponent of regime change in Iran; and R James Woolsey, the former CIA director who is one of the leading cheerleaders behind George Bush's plans to re-model the Muslim world along pro-US lines.

The ACPC heavily promotes the idea that the Chechen rebellion shows the undemocratic nature of Putin's Russia, and cultivates support for the Chechen cause by emphasising the seriousness of human rights violations in the tiny Caucasian republic. It compares the Chechen crisis to those other fashionable "Muslim" causes, Bosnia and Kosovo - implying that only international intervention in the Caucasus can stabilise the situation there. In August, the ACPC welcomed the award of political asylum in the US, and a US-government funded grant, to Ilyas Akhmadov, foreign minister in the opposition Chechen government, and a man Moscow describes as a terrorist. Coming from both political parties, the ACPC members represent the backbone of the US foreign policy establishment, and their views are indeed those of the US administration.

Although the White House issued a condemnation of the Beslan hostage-takers, its official view remains that the Chechen conflict must be solved politically. According to ACPC member Charles Fairbanks of Johns Hopkins University, US pressure will now increase on Moscow to achieve a political, rather than military, solution - in other words to negotiate with terrorists, a policy the US resolutely rejects elsewhere.

Allegations are even being made in Russia that the west itself is somehow behind the Chechen rebellion, and that the purpose of such support is to weaken Russia, and to drive her out of the Caucasus. The fact that the Chechens are believed to use as a base the Pankisi gorge in neighbouring Georgia - a country which aspires to join Nato, has an extremely pro-American government, and where the US already has a significant military presence - only encourages such speculation. Putin himself even seemed to lend credence to the idea in his interview with foreign journalists on Monday.

Proof of any such western involvement would be difficult to obtain, but is it any wonder Russians are asking themselves such questions when the same people in Washington who demand the deployment of overwhelming military force against the US's so-called terrorist enemies also insist that Russia capitulate to hers?

· John Laughland is a trustee of the British Helsinki Human Rights Group www.oscewatch.org


Interactive guide
Russian school hostage crisis

Audio reports
06.09.04: Nick Paton Walsh reports from Beslan, North Ossetia
03.09.04: Nick Paton Walsh reports from Beslan, North Ossetia
02.09.04: Nick Paton Walsh reports from Beslan, North Ossetia

Map
Site of the hostage crisis in North Ossetia

Comment and analysis
06.09.2004: Peter Preston: Writing the script for terror
05.09.2004: Leader: Horrors of the Beslan atrocity
03.09.2004: Simon Tisdall: A terrible lesson from a classroom in Beslan
02.09.2004: Battles began in days of the tsars
03.09.2004: Leader: Russian hostages

News reports
06.09.2004: Bombers' justification: Russians are killing our children
06.09.2004: A sombre march to graveside that sums up Russia's loss
06.09.2004: Frantic search for missing in Beslan
06.09.2004: Russia mourns Beslan's dead
05.09.2004: Muslim leaders condemn killers
04.09.2004: Bloodbath: up to 200 die as siege ends in mayhem
03.09.2004: Amid the savagery of the siege, an act of humanity
03.09.2004: Blasts and gunfire rock school
03.09.2004: Long wait raises dread of a bloody end
03.09.2004: Police station raiders are top suspects
03.09.2004: Putin promises to put lives of hostages first
02.09.2004: 'Exchange us for our children. What are they guilty of?'
02.09.2004: Explosions heard near Russian siege school
02.09.2004: Extremists turn fight for independence into unrelenting holy war
02.09.2004: Russia calls emergency session at UN
02.09.2004: West turns a blind eye to the politics of exasperation
01.09.2004: Contact made with hostage-takers

What the papers say
03.09.2004: Press review: Russian school siege

News guide
Russian media sources

Special reports
Russia
Chechnya

 次へ  前へ

戦争59掲示板へ



フォローアップ:


 

 

 

  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る


★登録無しでコメント可能。今すぐ反映 通常 |動画・ツイッター等 |htmltag可(熟練者向)
タグCheck |タグに'だけを使っている場合のcheck |checkしない)(各説明

←ペンネーム新規登録ならチェック)
↓ペンネーム(2023/11/26から必須)

↓パスワード(ペンネームに必須)

(ペンネームとパスワードは初回使用で記録、次回以降にチェック。パスワードはメモすべし。)
↓画像認証
( 上画像文字を入力)
ルール確認&失敗対策
画像の URL (任意):
投稿コメント全ログ  コメント即時配信  スレ建て依頼  削除コメント確認方法
★阿修羅♪ http://www.asyura2.com/  since 1995
 題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,MLを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。