★阿修羅♪ 現在地 HOME > Ψ空耳の丘Ψ39 > 160.html
 ★阿修羅♪
次へ 前へ
ホビットは「病人」じゃなかった〔BBC、朝日〕【インドネシアの身長1メートルのヒトの骨】
http://www.asyura2.com/0502/bd39/msg/160.html
投稿者 ネオファイト 日時 2005 年 3 月 05 日 14:44:30: ihQQ4EJsQUa/w

新種のヒト化石発見 インドネシアで、身長1メートル(朝日新聞) ― 1万8千年前まで生存したジャワ原人の子孫?
http://www.asyura2.com/0406/bd37/msg/625.html
投稿者 シジミ 日時 2004 年 10 月 28 日 19:55:32



http://www.asahi.com/science/update/0304/001.html
小さい脳でも能力は高い? インドネシアで発見のヒト

 インドネシアで骨が見つかり、約1万8000年前まで生存したとみられる身長約1メートルの人類「ホモ・フロレシエンシス」の脳の形を分析した結果、全体的な特徴は原人に近いが、独創的な活動などに必要な部分は、もっと大柄な原人より発達していたことがわかった。脳が大きくなるにつれて能力も高まったという、進化の通説が見直しを迫られそうだ。米、豪、インドネシアの研究チームが3日付の米科学誌サイエンス電子版で発表した。

 チームは同国フローレス島の洞穴で見つかった頭骨をCTスキャンにかけ、中に納まっていた脳の立体的な形を推定。それを現代人や、より原始的な原人、猿人、チンパンジーやゴリラといった類人猿の脳と比べた。

 フロレシエンシスの脳容積は417立方センチで、推定体重に対する比率は類人猿なみに小さかった。ただし、横から見た脳の形が比較的ぺしゃんこである点などは、原人に近かった。統合的な認知能力や意欲と深く関係がある脳の前面は、原人や猿人に比べて、突き出るような形で非常に発達していた。記憶などに重要な脳の側面も広がっていた。

 約1万8000年前までフロレシエンシスが生きていたとみられることから、一部の研究者は「現代人の亜種か、病気で脳や体が小さくなった現代人ではないか」と指摘していた。脳の形が現代人と大きく異なることが明らかになり、骨からだけでなく脳の形からも原人に近い新種であることが確認された。 (03/04 19:55)



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4308751.stm
Last Updated: Thursday, 3 March, 2005, 19:16 GMT
Hobbit was 'not a diseased human'
By Paul Rincon
BBC News science reporter

The famous skeleton from Indonesia nicknamed the "Hobbit" does not belong to a modern human pygmy with a brain disease, as some scientists argue.

That is one of the main outcomes of a detailed examination of the creature's braincase, published in Science.

The authors say their study of the Hobbit's brain supports the idea it is a new, dwarf species of human.

However, others contend the report does little to quash their theory it was actually a small, diseased person.

The remains of the small hominid from the Indonesian island of Flores were unveiled last year to worldwide acclaim.

The 18,000-year-old bones were unearthed at a site called Liang Bua, one of numerous limestone caves on Flores, and were designated LB1 and assigned to a human species new to science: Homo floresiensis.

But the skeleton of this tiny female with a brain no larger than a chimpanzee soon became mired in controversy.

Several prominent researchers - including the Indonesian palaeoanthropologist Teuku Jacob - argued that the remains were really those of a modern human (Homo sapiens), probably a pygmy with the brain defect known as microcephaly.

Microcephaly is a pathological condition characterised by an abnormally small head and brain and usually associated with mental difficulties.

Mirror image

The new study did not set out to address the controversy directly - but its findings appear to scotch the microcephaly theory, the Science magazine authors say.

The study shows that H. floresiensis managed to pack a number of features of more advanced brains into its tiny skull.

This may explain signs of advanced intelligence shown by the hominid, including the ability to hunt with sophisticated stone tools.

"The overall shape of LB1's brain resembles Homo erectus (an earlier ancestor of modern humans) more than anything else. But it's its own thing," said co-author Dean Falk, an anthropologist at Florida State University in Tallahassee.

"It has some very advanced features that harken towards [modern] humans. Those features are at the frontal lobe, the temporal lobes at the sides and at the back of the brain.

"In our opinion, LB1 is not in any way, shape or form, a true microcephalic."

Unless other forms of this condition are characterised by a Homo erectus-shaped brain, says Falk and her colleagues, the theory that LB1 is a microcephalic can be rejected.

Virtual model

Because the brain creates a mirror image of its surface inside the skull, scientists can create a cast by applying several layers of rubber paint to the cavity. When dry, this leaves a hollow rubber model - or endocast - of the brain that can be removed.

Professor Falk and researchers at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology used computed tomographic (CT) scan data on the original skull to create a 3D virtual endocast of LB1's brain.

The dimensions and features of this brain cast were then compared with endocasts from a number of different species: the chimpanzee; a normal modern human including the modern pygmy; an individual with true microcephaly; and Homo erectus.

Further comparisons were made with the ancient human-like creatures Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus aethiopicus; and even with modern gorillas.

Despite some advanced features, LB1's brain is in other ways intriguingly primitive. The ratio of brain size to body size in H. floresiensis is more similar to that of the australopithecines than to what one would expect if Homo erectus were miniaturised.

"I thought that it was really a very good description," said hominid brain specialist Ralph Holloway, of Columbia University in New York, US.

But, he added: "I think the real weakness was using one microcephalic [skull] in their comparison. I don't think true microcephaly was the one to go with."

'Not swayed'

Professor Holloway said the team should have tried to get hold of an individual with a more generalised condition called nanocephaly.

"They've made a convincing case for ruling out pathology to 95% confidence. But I think if they had extended their sample, it would have been more interesting," he explained.

Robert Eckhardt, of Penn State University, US, and a member of the group of researchers that believes LB1 was a microcephalic, said the team's work did not sway the disease theory.

"We have some comprehensive analyses underway which I really think will resolve this question," Professor Eckhardt said.

"What I would say for now is that the specimen has multiple phenomena that I would characterise as very strange oddities and probably pathologies."

But Dr Falk was keen to emphasise that the evidence for LB1's position as a separate species extends beyond a lone skull.

"There are other remains of Homo floresiensis, so it's from a population. And it looks pretty interesting from the neck down. So multiple evidence suggests to us that it's not a microcephalic," argued Dr Falk.

"If others are interested in pursuing that line of enquiry, we welcome that and look forward to reading it in a peer-reviewed journal."

A wrangle over custody of the hominid now seems to be drawing to a close. The bones were temporarily moved from the Centre for Archaeology in Jakarta to Professor Jacob's university so the researcher could study them for himself. This prompted fears that access to the remains might be restricted.

But most of the remains have now been returned to a secure facility at their home institution.


Homo floresiensis, National Geographic
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40460000/jpg/_40460955_indone_natgeo_203long.jpg
A male Homo floresiensis may have looked something like this (Image: National Geographic)

Tools found at Liang Bua Image: Chris Turney, University of Wollongong
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40883000/jpg/_40883833_hobtools_une_203.jpg
Tiny stone tools were found with the hobbit remains

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/04/sci_nat_enl_1098811069/html/1.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/04/sci_nat_enl_1098811069/img/laun.jpg
LB1 was an adult female that stood just one metre in height

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/05/sci_nat_enl_1109866240/html/1.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/05/sci_nat_enl_1109866240/img/laun.jpg
The Hobbit's brain has some surprisingly advanced features

 次へ  前へ

▲このページのTOPへ      HOME > Ψ空耳の丘Ψ39掲示板



フォローアップ:


 

 

 

 

  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る


★登録無しでコメント可能。今すぐ反映 通常 |動画・ツイッター等 |htmltag可(熟練者向)
タグCheck |タグに'だけを使っている場合のcheck |checkしない)(各説明

←ペンネーム新規登録ならチェック)
↓ペンネーム(2023/11/26から必須)

↓パスワード(ペンネームに必須)

(ペンネームとパスワードは初回使用で記録、次回以降にチェック。パスワードはメモすべし。)
↓画像認証
( 上画像文字を入力)
ルール確認&失敗対策
画像の URL (任意):
投稿コメント全ログ  コメント即時配信  スレ建て依頼  削除コメント確認方法
★阿修羅♪ http://www.asyura2.com/  since 1995
 題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,MLを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。