| Tweet |
ヨーロッパはなぜイスラエルを保護せなばならぬのか？（ロバート・フィスク）。
----------------------------------------------------------
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1221881.ece
1 September 2006 20:09
Robert Fisk: Why should Europeans protect Israel?
The enlarged Nato/Unifil force is not going to preserve 'peace'
Published:26 August 2006
First, it was to be a 15,000-strong foreign army to reinforce the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, Unifil. Now it is to be about 7,500. And it will not disarm Hizbollah. And anyway, Hizbollah refuses to be disarmed.
The French would send 200 men; then they sent 400. Then the Italians would send 3,000. Then the French would send another 2,000, making their total contribution 2,600, including the company that has remained in Unifil since the French were hurled out of the peacekeeping organisation back in 1986 after fighting Shia militias in the Lebanese village of Marrake (of which no mention will be made, any more than it is on the BBC). And now the Belgians might send 700. And the Turks? Well, the Lebanese Armenians are objecting to their contribution on the grounds - perfectly accurate, though the BBC will not tell you this - that the Turkish army perpetrated the genocide of one and a half Christian million Armenians in 1915. Oh, what a wondrous plot we weave when first we practise to deceive.
----------------------------------------------------------
- Re: ヨーロッパはなぜイスラエルを保護せねばならぬか？ ⇒ 英文全文とその和訳文へのリンクは次の投稿にあり。 gataro 2006/9/01 21:55:31
(1)
- Re: すみません。英文記事は冒頭部分だけしか読めません。和訳文は全文参照できます。（本文なし） gataro 2006/9/01 21:58:38
(0)
- Re: すみません。英文記事は冒頭部分だけしか読めません。和訳文は全文参照できます。（本文なし） gataro 2006/9/01 21:58:38
(0)
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。