| Tweet |
(回答先: 創造科学を信じるブッシュ大統領。このカルト大統領は人間というより猿に限りなく近いな。まだ進化の過程らしい 投稿者 戦争犯罪人ブッシュ 日時 2007 年 2 月 18 日 12:37:36)
少々古い記事であるが、Scientific Americanの2002年7月号より。
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanId=sa003&articleId=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
Opponents of evolution want to make a place for creationism by tearing down real science, but their arguments don't hold up
When Charles Darwin introduced the theory of evolution through natural selection 143 years ago, the scientists of the day argued over it fiercely, but the massing evidence from paleontology, genetics, zoology, molecular biology and other fields gradually established evolution's truth beyond reasonable doubt. Today that battle has been won everywhere--except in the public imagination. Embarrassingly, in the 21st century, in the most scientifically advanced nation the world has ever known, creationists can still persuade politicians, judges and ordinary citizens that evolution is a flawed, poorly supported fantasy.
困った事には、21世紀にもなって、世界の誰もが最も科学的に進んだ国であると認める（米）国で、創造主義信奉者たちが政治家、判事、一般市民に進化論は誤った幻想であると信じ込ませようとしている。
They lobby for creationist ideas such as "intelligent design" to be taught as alternatives to evolution in science classrooms.
彼等は知的計画などの創造主義思考を、学校の理科教育に代わるものとして生徒に教えるようロービイ活動をしている。
As this article goes to press, the Ohio Board of Education is debating whether to mandate such a change. Some antievolutionists, such as Philip E. Johnson, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley and author of Darwin on Trial, admit that they intend for intelligent-design theory to serve as a "wedge" for reopening science classrooms to discussions of God.
Besieged teachers and others may increasingly find themselves on the spot to defend evolution and refute creationism. The arguments that creationists use are typically specious and based on misunderstandings of (or outright lies about) evolution, but the number and diversity of the objections can put even well-informed people at a disadvantage. To help with answering them, the following list rebuts some of the most common "scientific" arguments raised against evolution. It also directs readers to further sources for information and explains why creation science has no place in the classroom.
以下、創造主義信奉者の典型的な主張１５について反駁しています。
1. Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law
2. Natural selection is based on circular reasoning: the fittest are those who survive, and those who survive are deemed fittest.
残り13については本文を参照されたい。
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。