★阿修羅♪ > 戦争97 > 715.html
 ★阿修羅♪
超巨大「治安維持法」、米国下院を通過(「思想犯」取締りにやっきの米国支配者)
http://www.asyura2.com/07/war97/msg/715.html
投稿者 バルセロナより愛を込めて 日時 2007 年 11 月 03 日 21:51:19: SO0fHq1bYvRzo
 

超巨大「治安維持法」、米国下院を通過(「思想犯」取締りにやっきの米国支配者)


これは次の記事からの引用です。著者はLee Rogers。
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=4682
House Passes Thought Crime Prevention Bill
(議会は思想犯罪防止法案を通過させる)

この記事を掲載しているブログ・サイトRoguegoverument.comのHPは次。
http://www.roguegovernment.com/

またこの記事は次のサイトでも見ることができます。
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7243
Big Brother: House passes the "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" (Global Research)

まだザッと見ただけで詳細な検討はできていませんが、「暴力的過激主義、国内テロリズムおよび思想に基づく暴力防止法案」とでもいうのでしょうか、どうやらthe Department of Homeland Security(国家安全保障省:長官マイケル・チャートフ)は憲法なんぞ無視してでも「暴力的過激主義、国内テロリズムおよび思想に基づく暴力」を予防するためにその萌芽(と政府が判断するもの)のうちから摘み取る、今までに無い強力な権限を手にするようです。法律は適用の仕方でどうにでも解釈できますので。(「国内テロリズム」はhomegrown terrorism ですから「国産テロリズム」と言った方が良いかもしれません。)

この法が実際に適用される場合、何が取り締まりの対象となるかは「政府の腹の内しだい」ということでしょうが、すでに何らかの発言あるいは研究と社会運動などの段階でも「予防措置」という名目であらゆる手段を用いて取り締まることが可能になるでしょう。しかもインターネット・サイトに対する弾圧も可能になるでしょう。明確に「思想犯取締り」ですね。

例えば、9・11真相解明運動なども「暴力的過激主義および国内テロリズム」につながると「判断された」ならばこの強権発動の対象になるわけです。何せこの法案でも「国際テロリズムとの戦い」がうたわれており、911---アル・カイダ---イスラム・テロの連立方程式がある以上は、「911内部犯行」などと言うヤカラを「国際テロリストを手を結ぶ国内テロリスト」と定義することも可能になりますので。(そうなったらmsqなんかが泣いて喜ぶだろうな。)

その他、ありとあらゆる告発と運動が、「政府の腹の内」次第で「思想に基づく暴力」として徹底的な弾圧の対象となります。もし対象とする運動が実際に暴力事件を起こしていない場合なら、でっち上げて、あるいは潜り込ませたスパイを使って何らかの暴力事件を起こさせれば良いのです。(こんなこと、どこの国でも昔からよくあることだろう。日本でもかつて「赤衛軍」による朝霞事件なんてものがあったね。その前から下山事件だの松川事件だの、色々あったからね。)そのときになってmsqをはじめとするシオニストの使い走りどもが何て言い出すか、もう今から十分に予想が付く、ってもんだ。


ところで、この法案を通過させた米国下院がいわゆるイスラエル(シオニスト)・ロビーの言いなりであることは有名な話で、シオニストの指導と許可なしで重要法案が通過することは考えられないでしょう。

また国家安全保障省の長官マイケル・チャートフは最も過激なジオコン(Zio-con)の一人であり、彼がこの「米国版超巨大治安維持法」を実行に移し具体的に適用させる部署の要となっているわけです。ついでに、その一族であるベンジャミン・チャートフは例のポピュラー・メカニックスで「燃えるジェット燃料がエレベーター・シャフトを伝って落ちて、WTCタワーのコアを弱くした」などという嘘デタラメを撒き散らしたヤツです。

誰が米国の支配者となっているのかすでに明確です。彼らの意図以外でこのような法案が通過することはありえません。


まあ、どうせこんなことをいうと、どこかのサイトで誰かさんが私のことを「反ユダヤ主義者」と言うに決まっていますね。こうしてそのような輩が自らシオニスト(パール、ウォルフォヴィッツ、ファイス、エイブラムス、クリストル、ポドレッツ、チャートフ、フォックスマン、ダショーヴィッツ、等々等々)の使い走りでしかないことを自分の手で暴露するわけです。

あのユダヤ人の一部に過ぎないシオニストどもは「反シオニスト」を「反ユダヤ主義」と言い換えて、思想取締りと弾圧の武器にします。(彼らはS.ジョーンズを「反ユダヤ主義」の難癖付けでBYUから追い出した。)日本でも十分にメディアと役所をびびらせる役にたちますので。

米国で第4帝国が着々と創り上げられているようです。そしてその属領でしかない我が日本はどうなるんでしょうね。私の住む欧州もその後を追うのでしょうか。


以下に、Roguegoverument.comに寄せられたLee Rogersの記事全文を貼り付けておきます。第1段落では参照記事のUrlを掲げておきます。

***************************************

House Passes Thought Crime Prevention Bill

10-25-2007
Lee Rogers

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed HR 1955 titled the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007.[1] This bill is one of the most blatant attacks against the Constitution yet and actually defines thought crimes as homegrown terrorism. If passed into law, it will also establish a commission and a Center of Excellence to study and defeat so called thought criminals. Unlike previous anti-terror legislation, this bill specifically targets the civilian population of the United States and uses vague language to define homegrown terrorism. Amazingly, 404 of our elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in favor of this bill.[2] There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the restoration of the Constitution.
[1] H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1955
[2] H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (Vote On Passage)
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2007-993


First let’s take a look at the definitions of violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism as defined in Section 899A of the bill.

The definition of violent radicalization uses vague language to define this term of promoting any belief system that the government considers to be an extremist agenda. Since the bill doesn’t specifically define what an extremist belief system is, it is entirely up to the interpretation of the government. Considering how much the government has done to destroy the Constitution they could even define Ron Paul supporters as promoting an extremist belief system. Literally, the government according to this definition can define whatever they want as an extremist belief system. Essentially they have defined violent radicalization as thought crime. The definition as defined in the bill is shown below.

`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.

The definition of homegrown terrorism uses equally vague language to further define thought crime. The bill includes the planned use of force or violence as homegrown terrorism which could be interpreted as thinking about using force or violence. Not only that but the definition is so vaguely defined, that petty crimes could even fall into the category of homegrown terrorism. The definition as defined in the bill is shown below.

`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

Section 899B of the bill goes over the findings of Congress as it pertains to homegrown terrorism. Particularly alarming is that the bill mentions the Internet as a main source for terrorist propaganda. The bill even mentions streams in obvious reference to many of the patriot and pro-constitution Internet radio networks that have been formed. It also mentions that homegrown terrorists span all ages and races indicating that the Congress is stating that everyone is a potential terrorist. Even worse is that Congress states in their findings that they should look at draconian police states like Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom as models to defeat homegrown terrorists. Literally, these findings of Congress fall right in line with the growing patriot community.

The biggest joke of all is that this section also says that any measure to prevent violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism should not violate the constitutional rights of citizens. However, the definition of violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism as they are defined in section 899A are themselves unconstitutional. The Constitution does not allow the government to arrest people for thought crimes, so any promises not to violate the constitutional rights of citizens are already broken by their own definitions.

SEC. 899B. FINDINGS.

`The Congress finds the following:

`(1) The development and implementation of methods and processes that can be utilized to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence in the United States is critical to combating domestic terrorism.

`(2) The promotion of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence exists in the United States and poses a threat to homeland security.

`(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens.

`(4) While the United States must continue its vigilant efforts to combat international terrorism, it must also strengthen efforts to combat the threat posed by homegrown terrorists based and operating within the United States.

`(5) Understanding the motivational factors that lead to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence is a vital step toward eradicating these threats in the United States.

`(6) The potential rise of self radicalized, unaffiliated terrorists domestically cannot be easily prevented through traditional Federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts, and requires the incorporation of State and local solutions.

`(7) Individuals prone to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence span all races, ethnicities, and religious beliefs, and individuals should not be targeted based solely on race, ethnicity, or religion.

`(8) Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.

`(9) Certain governments, including the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia have significant experience with homegrown terrorism and the United States can benefit from lessons learned by those nations.

Section 899C calls for a commission on the prevention of violent radicalization and ideologically based violence. The commission will consist of ten members appointed by various individuals that hold different positions in government. Essentially, this is a commission that will examine and report on how they are going to deal with violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism. So basically, the commission is being formed specifically on how to deal with thought criminals in the United States. The bill requires that the commission submit their final report 18 months following the commission’s first meeting as well as submit interim reports every 6 months leading up to the final report. Below is the bill’s defined purpose of the commission. Amazingly they even define one of the purposes of the commission to determine the causes of lone wolf violent radicalization.

(b) Purpose- The purposes of the Commission are the following:

`(1) Examine and report upon the facts and causes of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence in the United States, including United States connections to non-United States persons and networks, violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence in prison, individual or `lone wolf' violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence, and other faces of the phenomena of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence that the Commission considers important.

`(2) Build upon and bring together the work of other entities and avoid unnecessary duplication, by reviewing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of―

`(A) the Center of Excellence established or designated under section 899D, and other academic work, as appropriate;

`(B) Federal, State, local, or tribal studies of, reviews of, and experiences with violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence; and

`(C) foreign government studies of, reviews of, and experiences with violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence.

Section 899D of the bill establishes a Center of Excellence for the Study of Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism in the United States. Essentially, this will be a Department of Homeland Security affiliated institution that will study and determine how to defeat thought criminals.

Section 899E of the bill discusses how the government is going to defeat violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism through international cooperation. As stated in the findings section earlier in the legislation, they will unquestionably seek the advice of countries with draconian police states like the United Kingdom to determine how to deal with this growing threat of thought crime.

Possibly the most ridiculous section of the bill is Section 899F which states how they plan on protecting civil rights and civil liberties while preventing ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism. Here is what the section says.

`SEC. 899F. PROTECTING CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES WHILE PREVENTING IDEOLOGICALLY-BASED VIOLENCE AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM.

`(a) In General- The Department of Homeland Security's efforts to prevent ideologically-based violence and homegrown terrorism as described herein shall not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.

`(b) Commitment to Racial Neutrality- The Secretary shall ensure that the activities and operations of the entities created by this subtitle are in compliance with the Department of Homeland Security's commitment to racial neutrality.

`(c) Auditing Mechanism- The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department of Homeland Security will develop and implement an auditing mechanism to ensure that compliance with this subtitle does not result in a disproportionate impact, without a rational basis, on any particular race, ethnicity, or religion and include the results of its audit in its annual report to Congress required under section 705.'.

(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting at the end of the items relating to title VIII the following:

It states in the first subsection that in general the efforts to defeat thought crime shall not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights and civil liberties of the United States citizens and lawful permanent residents. How does this protect constitutional rights if they use vague language such as in general that prefaces the statement? This means that the Department of Homeland Security does not have to abide by the Constitution in their attempts to prevent so called homegrown terrorism.


This bill is completely insane. It literally allows the government to define any and all crimes including thought crime as violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism. Obviously, this legislation is unconstitutional on a number of levels and it is clear that all 404 representatives who voted in favor of this bill are traitors and should be removed from office immediately. The treason spans both political parties and it shows us all that there is no difference between them. The bill will go on to the Senate and will likely be passed and signed into the law by George W. Bush. Considering that draconian legislation like the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act have already been passed, there seems little question that this one will get passed as well. This is more proof that our country has been completely sold out by a group of traitors at all levels of government.

(引用終り)

  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る

 次へ  前へ

▲このページのTOPへ      HOME > 戦争97掲示板

フォローアップ:

このページに返信するときは、このボタンを押してください。投稿フォームが開きます。

 

  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る


★登録無しでコメント可能。今すぐ反映 通常 |動画・ツイッター等 |htmltag可(熟練者向)
タグCheck |タグに'だけを使っている場合のcheck |checkしない)(各説明

←ペンネーム新規登録ならチェック)
↓ペンネーム(2023/11/26から必須)

↓パスワード(ペンネームに必須)

(ペンネームとパスワードは初回使用で記録、次回以降にチェック。パスワードはメモすべし。)
↓画像認証
( 上画像文字を入力)
ルール確認&失敗対策
画像の URL (任意):
投稿コメント全ログ  コメント即時配信  スレ建て依頼  削除コメント確認方法
★阿修羅♪ http://www.asyura2.com/  since 1995
 題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,MLを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。