現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 議論９ > 738.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 議論９ > 738.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
(回答先: 欧米の国際法学者および専門家によるイラク侵略戦争に対するアピールのサイト 投稿者 Sara 日時 2003 年 4 月 06 日 23:25:22)
The Independentの記事から一部抜粋。
イギリスでもBlair首相はハーグ行きだ、との声。
ニュールンベルグ裁判のドイツに対する判決は今でも国際法上では生きている。（以下重要ポイントのみ抜粋。くわしくは以下のURL）
http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=394406
John Pilger: We see too much. We know too much. That's our best defence
06 April 2003
We now glimpse the forbidden truths of the invasion of Iraq. A man cuddles the body of his in-fant daughter; her blood drenches them. A woman in black pursues a tank, her arms outstretched; all seven in her family are dead. An American Marine murders a woman because she happens to be standing next to a man in a uniform. "I'm sorry,'' he says, "but the chick got in the way.''
Covering this in a shroud of respectability has not been easy for George Bush and Tony Blair. Millions now know too much; the crime is all too evident. Tam Dalyell, Father of the House of Commons, a Labour MP for 41 years, says the Prime Minister is a war criminal and should be sent to The Hague. He is serious, because the prima facie case against Blair and Bush is beyond doubt.
In 1946, the Nuremberg Tribunal rejected German arguments of the "necessity'' for pre-emptive attacks against its neighbours. "To initiate a war of aggression,'' said the tribunal's judgment, "is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.''
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。