★阿修羅♪ > 原発 劣化ウラン フッ素3 > 115.html
 ★阿修羅♪
漏れのある核燃料再処理施設はずっと閉鎖した方が良い、とセラフィールドの所長[Observer]
http://www.asyura2.com/0505/genpatu3/msg/115.html
投稿者 ネオファイト 日時 2005 年 5 月 15 日 16:37:51: ihQQ4EJsQUa/w
 

(回答先: 英国の原発増加と核廃棄物処理問題[Independent] 投稿者 ネオファイト 日時 2005 年 5 月 15 日 16:19:32)

英核燃会社:核物質30年間放置 貯蔵プールに溶け出す [毎日新聞]【日本向けでもデータを捏造した会社】
http://www.asyura2.com/0403/genpatu2/msg/566.html
投稿者 あっしら 日時 2004 年 12 月 12 日 14:33:44

英が放射性廃棄物政策を転換、中レベルを国内で処分(読売)【高レベルは送り返し】
http://www.asyura2.com/0403/genpatu2/msg/576.html
投稿者 ネオファイト 日時 2004 年 12 月 16 日 11:44:03



「放射性物質がイギリスのセラフィールドの再処理工場で漏れ、、施設が閉鎖された」(河野太郎の国会日記)
http://www.asyura2.com/0502/nihon16/msg/751.html
投稿者 外野 日時 2005 年 5 月 10 日 22:04:51

Huge radioactive leak closes Thorp nuclear plant
http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,2763,1479527,00.html
Paul Brown, environment correspondent
Monday May 9, 2005
The Guardian

Nuclear plant closed after radioactive flood
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7359
18:32 09 May 2005
NewScientist.com news service
Paul Marks



Thorpは日本の核ゴミの処理もしていたのだが、永久に閉鎖した方が経済的に安上がりでもあるとNDAはオブザーバー紙に語った。また、BEは、新しい原発は民営となりそうだが運営会社は建設資本投下には乗り気ではない、と話し、出資する投資家も存在するかは怪しいのだが、運営と資金は別と言う形態になるとほのめかした。

http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,2763,1483997,00.html
Close nuclear leak plant for good, says Sellafield

Thorp reprocessing should never be restarted - boss

Oliver Morgan, industrial editor
Sunday May 15, 2005
The Observer

The owner of the Sellafield site in Cumbria, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, wants its main reprocessing facility to shut forever following a leak of highly radioactive liquefied nuclear fuel containing plutonium and uranium.

The move would bring an early end to the UK's reprocessing programme, which was conceived in the Sixties to provide plutonium for Britain's nuclear deterrent while recycling uranium for civil energy needs.

In any event, the leak of some 20 tonnes of uranium and plutonium fuel, dissolved in nitric acid, will keep the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (Thorp) shut for months.

But senior sources at the NDA, the government body set up to dismantle radioactive facilities at 20 sites across the UK, now believes that keeping the plant shut is the most economical option, and also one that would remove reprocessing - which has always attracted controversy - from the debate over building new nuclear stations which many believe the government is keen to initiate.

'The view is that Thorp should never restart,' said a senior source.

Officials indicate that, even when operational, the plant does not make money. Thorp's figures are not split out in the NDA's plan for 2005-6. However, the published figures show that, of a total budget of £2.2 billion, the NDA receives some £1.08bn from the commercial operations it inherited from British Nuclear Fuels. Of this, it expects to get £635.1 million from reprocessing and transporting nuclear material around the world.

A large proportion of this figure will be from Thorp's activities - reprocessing spent fuel from British Energy's nuclear power stations, along with contracts from Japan, Germany and other overseas customers. But the NDA also incurs huge costs from Sellafield, forecast to be £727.4m over 2005-6. Also, up to three new storage facilities for separated plutonium and uranium are needed, at a cost of nearly £200m each.

Meanwhile the NDA official said: 'The government is starting to think about new stations. The view is that it would be impossible to argue that there should be a new generation [of facilities] that relies on reprocessing.'

Closing Thorp would reduce the time it takes to run down the massive stockpile of 'highly active liquid' - spent nuclear fuel containing uranium and plutonium - by four and a half years. Nuclear regulators have insisted on the backlog being dealt with by 2015. And closure of Thorp would drastically reduce emissions into the Irish Sea, a continuing source of tension with the Irish government.

NDA chief executive Ian Roxburgh told The Observer that a decision on closure would be up to the government. He added: 'The NDA must produce by the autumn its plans for the 20 sites it operates, including Sellafield. The latest incident had clearly brought that forward.'

Meanwhile, sources at British Energy have indicated that the privatised nuclear operator wants to run any new nuclear power stations, but is not keen to take a major investment stake in any projects. There are doubts over whether private investors have the appetite to finance and build a new generation of reactors, given the volatility of energy markets.

The sources believe the operation of new plants should be kept separate from ownership and financing.

 次へ  前へ

  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る

▲このページのTOPへ       HOME > 原発 劣化ウラン フッ素3掲示板



  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る


★登録無しでコメント可能。今すぐ反映 通常 |動画・ツイッター等 |htmltag可(熟練者向)
タグCheck |タグに'だけを使っている場合のcheck |checkしない)(各説明

←ペンネーム新規登録ならチェック)
↓ペンネーム(2023/11/26から必須)

↓パスワード(ペンネームに必須)

(ペンネームとパスワードは初回使用で記録、次回以降にチェック。パスワードはメモすべし。)
↓画像認証
( 上画像文字を入力)
ルール確認&失敗対策
画像の URL (任意):
投稿コメント全ログ  コメント即時配信  スレ建て依頼  削除コメント確認方法
★阿修羅♪ http://www.asyura2.com/  since 1995
 題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,MLを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。