★阿修羅♪ > 国際20 > 358.html
 ★阿修羅♪  
▲コメTop ▼コメBtm 次へ 前へ
バノン氏:米大統領のために戦う−議会やメディアの敵に対し(Bloomberg)
http://www.asyura2.com/17/kokusai20/msg/358.html
投稿者 こーるてん 日時 2017 年 8 月 19 日 15:16:02: hndh7vd2.ZV/2 grGBW4LpgsSC8Q
 

https://www.bloomberg.co.jp/news/articles/2017-08-19/OUWQD46K50XS01?utm_source=yjp&utm_medium=bd&utm_campaign=yjp

Joshua Green、Justin Sink、Margaret Talev

2017年8月19日 10:31 JST

トランプ政権の首席戦略官を退いたスティーブ・バノン氏は保守系ニュースサイト「ブライトバート・ニュース」に18日に戻った後、米大統領のために「戦いを始める」と述べ、同サイトの主張に反対する人たちへの闘争を強めると言明した。

  バノン氏は同日、ブルームバーグ・ニュースに対し、「混乱があるなら明確にしたい。私はホワイトハウスを去り、トランプ氏のために議会やメディア、米国株式会社にいる同氏の敵に対する戦いを始める」と語った。首席戦略官の退任発表後、バノン氏が公的に発言したのは初めて。ブライトバートの声明によると、同氏は会長に復帰した。

  バノン氏に近い関係者1人は同氏退任について、バージニア州シャーロッツビルで起きた白人至上主義者の暴力行為に対するトランプ大統領の発言への批判とは関係ないと指摘。同関係者によると、バノン氏は今月7日に辞表を提出し、14日付で辞任の予定だったが、暴力行為後の混乱で発表が遅れていた。



  同氏の退任でケリー大統領首席補佐官の立場は強化。また、政策をめぐってバノン氏としばしば対立したマクマスター大統領補佐官(国家安全保障問題担当)やコーン国家経済会議(NEC)委員長ら、トランプ政権内でライバルだった人物を強めることになる。

原題:Bannon Says He’s ‘Going to War for Trump’ After White House Exit(抜粋)

(転写終了)
 

  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る

コメント
 
1. 2017年8月19日 18:34:24 : EMsdZ5oaY3 : PX3fk502zZo[2]

辞任劇は一時的な雨宿り。政権内にいるより外の方が自由に言える。内外で

足を引っ張る議員や閣僚やメディアの真実を暴露して牽制できる。そういう味方

がいなかった。シャーロッツビル事件で不条理な言いがかりからトランプを一時

避難させる為にバノンが身を引いた、ページをめくるための献身である。フェイ

クニュースは真実を隠してウソを捏造する。



2. 2017年8月20日 13:43:37 : quMKleKEOA : apQvoj4eROs[368]
バノンが政権内にいると、バノンの主張がホワイトハウス内部の議論に吸収されて外部に出にくいといった欠点があったわけだから、
これからはバノン(これはブキャナンの後継者と見なしていいのか?)の主張が公共の目に触れる機会が増える、という利点はあるのかな

3. 2017年8月20日 19:56:33 : quMKleKEOA : apQvoj4eROs[377]
ブキャナンのサイトの最新記事1つくらい引用しておくか
http://buchanan.org/blog/americas-second-civil-war-127520
America’s Second Civil War
By Patrick J. Buchanan

“They had found a leader, Robert E. Lee — and what a leader! … No military leader since Napoleon has aroused such enthusiastic devotion among troops as did Lee when he reviewed them on his horse Traveller.”

So wrote Samuel Eliot Morison in his magisterial “The Oxford History of the American People” in 1965.

First in his class at West Point, hero of the Mexican War, Lee was the man to whom President Lincoln turned to lead his army. But when Virginia seceded, Lee would not lift up his sword against his own people, and chose to defend his home state rather than wage war upon her.

This veneration of Lee, wrote Richard Weaver, “appears in the saying attributed to a Confederate soldier, ‘The rest of us may have … descended from monkeys, but it took a God to make Marse Robert.'”

Growing up after World War II, this was accepted history.

Yet, on the militant left today, the name Lee evokes raw hatred and howls of “racist and traitor.” A clamor has arisen to have all statues of him and all Confederate soldiers and statesmen pulled down from their pedestals and put in museums or tossed onto trash piles.

What has changed since 1965?

It is not history. There have been no great new discoveries about Lee.

What has changed is America herself. She is not the same country. We have passed through a great social, cultural and moral revolution that has left us irretrievably divided on separate shores.

And the politicians are in panic.

Two years ago, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe called the giant statues of Lee and “Stonewall” Jackson on Richmond’s Monument Avenue “parts of our heritage.” After Charlottesville, New York-born-and-bred McAuliffe, entertaining higher ambitions, went full scalawag, demanding the statues be pulled down as “flashpoints for hatred, division, and violence.”

Who hates the statues, Terry? Who’s going to cause the violence? Answer: The Democratic left whom Terry must now appease.

McAuliffe is echoed by Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam, the Democratic candidate in November to succeed McAuliffe. GOP nominee Ed Gillespie wants Monument Avenue left alone.

The election is the place to decide this, but the left will not wait.

In Durham, North Carolina, our Taliban smashed the statue of a Confederate soldier. Near the entrance of Duke University Chapel, a statue of Lee has been defaced, the nose broken off.


Wednesday at dawn, Baltimore carried out a cultural cleansing by taking down statues of Lee and Maryland Chief Justice Roger Taney who wrote the Dred Scott decision and opposed Lincoln’s suspension of the right of habeas corpus.

Like ISIS, which smashed the storied ruins of Palmyra, and the al-Qaida rebels who ravaged the fabled Saharan city of Timbuktu, the new barbarism has come to America. This is going to become a blazing issue, not only between but within the parties.

For there are 10 Confederates in Statuary Hall in the Capitol, among them Lee, Georgia’s Alexander Stephens, vice president to Jefferson Davis, and Davis himself. The Black Caucus wants them gone.

Mount Rushmore-sized carvings of Lee, Jackson and Davis are on Stone Mountain, Georgia. Are they to be blasted off?

There are countless universities, colleges and high schools like Washington & Lee named for Confederate statesmen and soldiers. Across the Potomac from D.C. are Jefferson Davis Highway and Leesburg Pike to Leesburg itself, 25 miles north. Are all highways, streets, towns and counties named for Confederates to be renamed? What about Fort Bragg?

On every Civil War battlefield, there are monuments to the Southern fallen. Gettysburg has hundreds of memorials, statues and markers. But if, as the left insists we accept, the Confederates were traitors trying to tear America apart to preserve an evil system, upon what ground do Democrats stand to resist the radical left’s demands?

What do we do with those battlefields where Confederates were victorious: Bull Run, Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville?

“Where does this all end?” President Trump asked.

It doesn’t. Not until America’s histories and biographies are burned and new texts written to Nazify Lee, Jackson, Davis and all the rest, will a newly indoctrinated generation of Americans accede to this demand to tear down and destroy what their fathers cherished.

And once all the Confederates are gone, one must begin with the explorers, and then the slave owners like Presidents Washington, Jefferson and Madison, who seceded from slave-free Britain. White supremacists all.

Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay of Kentucky and John Calhoun must swiftly follow.

Then there are all those segregationists. From 1865 to 1965, virtually all of the great Southern senators were white supremacists.

In the first half of the 20th century, Woodrow Wilson and FDR carried all 11 states of a rigidly segregationist South all six times they ran, and FDR rewarded Dixie by putting a Klansman on the Supreme Court.

While easy for Republicans to wash their hands of such odious elements as Nazis in Charlottesville, will they take up the defense of the monuments and statues that have defined our history, or capitulate to the icon-smashers?


  拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る

フォローアップ:


★登録無しでコメント可能。今すぐ反映 通常 |動画・ツイッター等 |htmltag可(熟練者向)
タグCheck |タグに'だけを使っている場合のcheck |checkしない)(各説明

←ペンネーム新規登録ならチェック)
↓ペンネーム(2023/11/26から必須)

↓パスワード(ペンネームに必須)

(ペンネームとパスワードは初回使用で記録、次回以降にチェック。パスワードはメモすべし。)
↓画像認証
( 上画像文字を入力)
ルール確認&失敗対策
画像の URL (任意):
投稿コメント全ログ  コメント即時配信  スレ建て依頼  削除コメント確認方法

▲上へ      ★阿修羅♪ > 国際20掲示板 次へ  前へ

★阿修羅♪ http://www.asyura2.com/ since 1995
スパムメールの中から見つけ出すためにメールのタイトルには必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
すべてのページの引用、転載、リンクを許可します。確認メールは不要です。引用元リンクを表示してください。
 
▲上へ       
★阿修羅♪  
国際20掲示板  
次へ